Environmental Court Cases: Urgenda

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

Natural Justice have developed a series of summaries of significant court cases from across the world related to climate change and rights of nature. These are designed for the public, policy makers and practitioners and provide a snapshot of cases that are being brought to courts in order to advance the protection and rights of nature, including seeking ways to hold governments accountable for their international commitments to reducing carbon emissions.

Urgenda Foundation v The State of the Netherlands

Until 2011, the State of the Netherlands felt it was necessary to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 30% by 2020. However, later, the State aligned its policy with the European Union’s emissions target, lowering the target to 20% without providing scientific reasoning. A citizen’s platform, Urgenda, approached The Hague District Court asking for the Court to order the State to achieve a more ambitious level of reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by the end of 2020. In 2015, The Hague District Court ordered the State to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 25% by the end of 2020. The State appealed the decision.

Read more by downloading the PDF.

Related Publications

2019-2020 Annual Report

The Impact of Climate Change on the Cape Flats Aquifer

Why do we need to protect the Cape Flats Aquifer?

African Environmental Defenders Fund: Report 2019-2021

Audit Communautaire des Impacts de la Centrale a Charbon de …

Natural Justice Strategy 2020-2022

Scroll to Top

Sign up to Natural Justice!

Receive our quarterly newsletter or get blog updates. Easily unsubscribe at any time.